aa-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to aa-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceProvides access to real-time LLM pricing, speed metrics, and performance benchmarks for over 300 models from Artificial Analysis. It enables users to list, filter, and compare models based on costs, tokens per second, and intelligence indices.228 npm9MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to compare LLM benchmarks, get pricing, and receive model recommendations for tasks and budgets.1MIT

Modelmeterofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to query model pricing, deprecations, and cost estimates via a machine-readable changelog of the AI stack.1MIT- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables coding agents to query AI model API prices, including historical point-in-time lookups with cited sources, using a bundled dated dataset and requiring no API keys.534 npmMIT

apipriceindex-mcpofficial
AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceGives AI agents live, verified LLM API prices from apipriceindex.com, enabling cost estimation, model search, and price lookups with verification metadata.333 PyPIMIT- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables real-time access to LLM pricing, benchmarks, deprecation alerts, and cost optimization for over 30 models across 8 providers, allowing AI agents to make cost-effective model selections.-
TDQS
Scored across 7 tools
Each tool targets a distinct operation: healthcheck for connectivity, list_llms for listing models, get_model for details, compare_models for comparison, list_media_models for media models, list_recent_updates for tracking changes, and evaluate_critpt for benchmark submission. No overlap or ambiguity.
All tools use the 'aa_' prefix with consistent snake_case naming. Most follow a verb_noun pattern (list_llms, get_model, compare_models, evaluate_critpt, list_media_models, list_recent_updates), with only healthcheck being a single word, which is acceptable.
With 7 tools, the set is well-scoped for an LLM model comparison and evaluation API. It covers essential operations (listing, details, comparison, benchmark submission, updates tracking, healthcheck) without unnecessary bloat or missing core functionality.
The tool surface covers listing, detail, comparison, media models, updates, and evaluation submission. A minor gap is the lack of a tool to retrieve past evaluation results or browse problems, but the core workflow is supported.