Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
aa-mcp

aa-mcp

by Leev1s
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to aa-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • aa-mcp

      HenryGetz
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to query live artificialanalysis.ai data — leaderboards, model digests, benchmarks, pricing, cost-per-task, speed, provider endpoints, and image/video/speech/music arenas — through token-efficient table tools that need no API key. It works from the site's public RSC payloads by default, with an optional JSON-API backend (and automatic fallback) for capability and coding/agentic indexes.
      12
      1
      MIT

    • Artificial Analysis MCP Server

      davidhariri
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides access to real-time LLM pricing, speed metrics, and performance benchmarks for over 300 models from Artificial Analysis. It enables users to list, filter, and compare models based on costs, tokens per second, and intelligence indices.
      2
      35 npm
      9
      MIT

    • aa-mcp

      ahmetem
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables querying independent LLM metrics (price, speed, benchmarks, providers) from Artificial Analysis through MCP, with caching and tier-aware access.
      4
      GPL 3.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct operation: healthcheck for connectivity, list_llms for listing models, get_model for details, compare_models for comparison, list_media_models for media models, list_recent_updates for tracking changes, and evaluate_critpt for benchmark submission. No overlap or ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools use the 'aa_' prefix with consistent snake_case naming. Most follow a verb_noun pattern (list_llms, get_model, compare_models, evaluate_critpt, list_media_models, list_recent_updates), with only healthcheck being a single word, which is acceptable.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 7 tools, the set is well-scoped for an LLM model comparison and evaluation API. It covers essential operations (listing, details, comparison, benchmark submission, updates tracking, healthcheck) without unnecessary bloat or missing core functionality.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers listing, detail, comparison, media models, updates, and evaluation submission. A minor gap is the lack of a tool to retrieve past evaluation results or browse problems, but the core workflow is supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources