Skip to main content
Glama
If you're referring to the MCP server published by this repository, it's **herdr-inbox** (the README calls it “herdr inbox”).

**Description:** It lets Claude Code agents running in herdr ask a question once, get a receipt, and keep working instead of blocking, while the operator answers all open questions from a single popup and each answer is delivered back to the pane that asked.

A couple of notes on the constraints you gave:

- The name used is the repository's own project name, **herdr-inbox**, not a person or organization.
- The description deliberately avoids repeating the name and focuses on what the server enables: asynchronous agent questions, non-blocking work, centralized answering, and delivery back to the originating agent.
- If you want the answer as a strict JSON object only, it would be:

```json
{
  "name": "herdr-inbox",
  "description": "Enables Claude Code agents running in herdr to ask a question once, receive a receipt, and continue working instead of blocking, while the operator answers all open questions from one popup and each answer is delivered back to the pane that asked."
}
```

If you're referring to the MCP server published by this repository, it's **herdr-inbox** (the README calls it “herdr inbox”). **Description:** It lets Claude Code agents running in herdr ask a question once, get a receipt, and keep working instead of blocking, while the operator answers all open questions from a single popup and each answer is delivered back to the pane that asked. A couple of notes on the constraints you gave: - The name used is the repository's own project name, **herdr-inbox**, not a person or organization. - The description deliberately avoids repeating the name and focuses on what the server enables: asynchronous agent questions, non-blocking work, centralized answering, and delivery back to the originating agent. - If you want the answer as a strict JSON object only, it would be: ```json { "name": "herdr-inbox", "description": "Enables Claude Code agents running in herdr to ask a question once, receive a receipt, and continue working instead of blocking, while the operator answers all open questions from one popup and each answer is delivered back to the pane that asked." } ```

Official
by LeaveMyYard

check_answers

Retrieve operator answers to your questions that you haven't seen yet, marking them seen. Fallback for missed inbox messages or after compaction.

Instructions

Return operator answers to your questions that you have not seen yet, and mark them seen.

Answers are normally delivered as [inbox] messages naming the Q ids; use this as a fallback (e.g. after compaction or if a delivery was missed).

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.8.0

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the burden and does disclose the key trait that this mutates state by marking answers seen, plus the unread-only scope. It does not say whether 'seen' is global or per-consumer, nor anything about idempotency, but the core behavioral disclosure is present.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, no waste, with the action and its side effect front-loaded before the fallback guidance.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists so return values need no explanation, and with no parameters the definition is nearly self-sufficient. The only residual gap is the scope/permanence of the 'seen' marking, which an agent might wonder about but is not essential to calling it.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Zero parameters are accepted, so there is nothing for the description to clarify; the baseline for a no-parameter tool is 4.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('return operator answers... not seen yet') plus the side effect ('mark them seen'). It is clearly distinguished from question-oriented siblings such as list_my_questions by dealing with answers rather than questions.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly frames itself as a fallback and names the primary delivery mechanism ('normally delivered as [inbox] messages'), with concrete triggering conditions: after compaction or a missed delivery. Nothing is left to inference.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.