scout_snapshot

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, but description discloses that lite mode skips a screenshot saving tokens, and full mode includes visual page. No side effects mentioned, but operation is likely read-only.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences, no waste. First sentence states purpose, second provides guidance on lite mode with token savings, third reinforces when to use full. Perfectly front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With only one parameter and no output schema, the description covers the tool's behavior and parameter usage adequately. Could mention format of accessibility tree, but 'numbered elements' is sufficient for the intended use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with a description for the param. The description adds practical value: explains lite=true saves tokens and when to use each mode, beyond the schema's simple boolean description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it takes a snapshot and returns an accessibility tree with numbered elements. This differentiates it from siblings like scout_screenshot, which likely only captures visual screenshots.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit guidance on when to use lite=true (skip screenshot, save tokens) vs full snapshot (when visual is needed). No explicit when-not or sibling comparison, but context is strong.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.