Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to ghidraMCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that allows LLMs to autonomously reverse engineer applications by exposing Ghidra's functionality, including decompiling binaries, analyzing code, and renaming methods and data.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      MCP server that allows LLMs to autonomously reverse engineer applications using Ghidra, exposing tools like decompilation, renaming, and listing methods.
      27
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables LLMs to autonomously reverse engineer applications through Cutter, allowing them to decompile binaries, analyze code, and rename methods programmatically.
      34
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      ghidraMCP is an MCP server that allows LLMs to autonomously reverse engineer applications by exposing core Ghidra functionality as tools for MCP clients.
      3
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server integrating Ghidra reverse engineering tool with LLMs, enabling automated binary analysis, decompilation, and symbol management via MCP.
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An Model Context Protocol server that enables LLMs to autonomously reverse engineer applications by exposing Ghidra's decompilation and analysis tools. It allows AI agents to list code structures, rename methods, and analyze binaries directly through MCP-compatible clients.
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 30 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct resources/actions (list vs get vs rename vs set), and the descriptions proactively resolve ambiguity (e.g. decompile_function vs decompile_function_by_address, 'prefer rename_function_by_address'). Minor overlap exists in the xref trio (get_xrefs_to, get_xrefs_from, get_function_xrefs) and between list_functions / search_functions_by_name / deprecated list_methods, but directionality and filters make each usable.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern throughout, using a small predictable verb set (list_, get_, decompile_, disassemble_, rename_, set_). Variants like get_function_by_address and decompile_function_by_address follow the same convention, so nothing surprises the agent.

    Tool Count3/5

    30 tools is heavy and pushes past the comfortable range for a single server. Reverse-engineering genuinely needs many read/analyze/write operations, but the deprecated list_methods is dead weight and several near-duplicate pairs (function vs by_address) inflate the surface.

    Completeness4/5

    Strong lifecycle coverage for an analysis server: discovery (imports, exports, functions, strings, data, segments), analysis (decompile, disassemble, xrefs, call graph), and modification (renames, prototypes, types, comments), plus raw memory reads. Gaps remain for active patching/writing memory, creating/undefining functions, or searching by bytes, but core workflows are covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive