Skip to main content
Glama
LassiterJ

MCP Server Starter

by LassiterJ

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
PORTNoHTTP server port (HTTP mode only)3000
CORS_ORIGINNoCORS allowed origins (HTTP mode only)*
STARTER_TRANSPORTNoTransport mode: stdio or httpstdio

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{
  "listChanged": true
}
prompts
{
  "listChanged": true
}
resources
{
  "listChanged": true
}
completions
{}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
echoC

Echo back the provided text

fetchC

Fetch a stub document by id and return full text

searchB

Search stub documents and return minimal results (id, title, url)

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription
code-analyzerAnalyze code for security, performance, style issues, and bugs
generate-readmeGenerate a README file for a project

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription
System InformationGet basic system information about the server
ISO 8601 formatGet current timestamp in various formats
Unix timestampGet current timestamp in various formats
Human-readable formatGet current timestamp in various formats

TDQS

B3.2/5.0

Scored across 3 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: echo handles text reflection, fetch retrieves specific documents by ID, and search performs document queries with minimal results. There is no overlap in functionality, making tool selection straightforward.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent, simple verb pattern (echo, fetch, search) without any deviations in style or convention. This uniformity enhances predictability and usability.

Tool Count3/5

With only 3 tools, the server feels minimal for a 'starter' purpose, potentially lacking depth for more complex tasks. While not extreme, it borders on being too thin for broader utility.

Completeness2/5

The tool set is severely incomplete for a document management domain, missing essential CRUD operations like create, update, or delete. Agents will face dead ends when trying to modify or manage documents.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues