Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
mcp-csv-database

mcp-csv-database

by Lasitha-Jayawardana
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

backup_database

Backup the active CSV database to a specified file path for data preservation and recovery.

Instructions

Create a backup of the current database to a file.

Args: backup_path: Path where to save the backup file

Returns: Status message

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "backup_path": "<backup_path>"
    },
    "name": "backup_database"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
backup_pathYes

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.1.6

TDQS

B3/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description does not disclose whether the backup locks the database, overwrites existing files, or requires specific permissions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is short but includes redundant Args/Returns sections that mostly repeat schema information. Could be more concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Simple tool with 1 required param and an output schema, but description lacks context on impact (e.g., downtime, size estimates) and prerequisites (e.g., write permissions to backup_path).

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, but description adds a brief explanation for backup_path ('Path where to save the backup file') beyond the schema's title. However, it lacks details on format, validity, or constraints.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states 'Create a backup of the current database to a file' using a specific verb and resource, and it distinguishes from sibling tools like clear_database or export_table_to_csv.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., export_table_to_csv) or any prerequisites (e.g., admin permissions).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools