Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to emovi-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for accessing India's Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (MoSPI) data APIs. Enables natural language queries for economic, demographic, and social indicators via a 4-tool workflow.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for ENAHO (Peru's national household survey) microdata. Enables discovery, download, merging, and complex-survey statistical estimation of official poverty and income indicators, with report generation.
      32
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that exposes the IPUMS API as LLM tools for browsing metadata, creating and downloading extracts, and generating reproducible R/Python code.
      23
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that answers natural-language questions over CSV, Excel, and SQL data by providing deterministic tools for loading, profiling, querying, cleaning, statistical analysis, visualization, and reporting. It enables LLMs to plan and interpret while all computation is done exactly through MCP tools.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server giving LLMs live access to Statistics Canada's full catalogue of 8,200+ data tables via the Web Data Service, with tools to search tables, inspect dimensions, and fetch time series data using plain-language prompts.
      5
      38 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: compare_groups, tabulate, and weighted_stats all handle different analyses; transition_matrix is unique; list_variables and variable_detail are complementary but not overlapping. No two tools could be confused.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names use snake_case with a mostly verb_noun pattern (e.g., compare_groups, describe_survey). A few names like financial_inclusion_summary break the pattern but style remains consistent.

    Tool Count5/5

    11 tools cover data exploration, filtering, statistics, specialized analyses, and visualization. The scope is well-matched to the survey domain without unnecessary excess or deficiency.

    Completeness4/5

    Core workflows (variable exploration, cross-tabulation, mobility analysis, visualizations) are covered. Missing advanced modeling or export options, but the set handles essential research tasks.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues