oncall-router-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to oncall-router-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents and MCP-compliant clients to autonomously evaluate SLA breach incidents, escalate alerts, and execute canary rollback playbooks with deterministic, zero-dependency Python tooling.8-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for the Rootly incident management platform — alerts, incidents, on-call schedules-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceSelf-hosted operational dashboard and MCP server that catalogs runnable services and their operational context, offering a read-only MCP endpoint to list projects, service status, runbooks, and reconciliation context.1Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables PagerDuty incident response operations including listing incidents, acknowledging and resolving incidents, looking up on-call schedules, and listing services.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables deterministic triage of OpenShift alerts by executing YAML-defined runbooks against an upstream OCP MCP server, collecting auditable evidence bundles for LLM interpretation.-

runframe-mcp-serverofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables managing incident response workflows including incidents, on-call, postmortems, and more through the Runframe platform using MCP tools.50 npm4MIT
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool targets a distinct aspect of incident routing: ownership (who_owns), escalation (escalation_path), response steps (playbook), and timing (impact_clock). There is no overlap in purpose, and the descriptions make boundaries clear.
All tool names are lowercase snake_case and are descriptive, but the pattern varies slightly: who_owns is a question-like phrase, while the others are noun compounds. This is a minor inconsistency, but the naming remains intuitive and predictable.
With only 4 tools, the server is tightly scoped to incident routing. Each tool delivers a unique, essential capability without redundancy, making the count ideal for the domain.
The tool set covers the core incident routing workflow: identifying ownership, following escalation paths, accessing playbooks, and tracking escalation timing. Minor gaps like incident acknowledgment or status updates exist but are outside the router's stated purpose.