Criar diretório

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It does disclose a key behavior—creating parent directories—and the workspace scope, but it does not explain what happens if the directory already exists, error conditions, or the role of confirm_token. Some behavior is covered, but significant gaps remain.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single sentence with zero waste, front-loading the action and adding one key modifier (parents). Perfectly sized for the content provided.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with no annotations, no output schema, and 0% parameter coverage, the description is too thin. It explains what it creates but not when confirm_token is needed, conflict behavior, or any error conditions. Agents may handle simple calls but will likely be uncertain in real-world usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not mention either parameter (path or confirm_token). It adds no meaning beyond the schema's type constraints, leaving the optional confirm_token completely unexplained.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific action ('cria' = creates) and resource ('diretório'), including a key modifier that parent directories are also created. This clearly distinguishes it from sibling tools like write_file or move_path.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The intended use (creating a directory) is implied by the name and description, but there is no explicit guidance about when to choose this over siblings, no exclusions, and no mention of prerequisites like confirm_token. The usage is implied but not elaborated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.