Skip to main content
Glama
LMPrado-DZ23

DZ23 Subagents Universal MCP

by LMPrado-DZ23
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to DZ23 Subagents Universal MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Agent Harness Kit

      Ngoc7225
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides a provider-agnostic MCP server that coordinates structured multi-agent workflows, owning task claims, action logs, handoffs, and server-side health gates for coding agents. It enables tracked specs, tasks, reviews, and verified completion across Claude Code, Codex CLI, Cursor, Grok Build, and OpenCode.
      29 npm
      MIT

    • BirdEye

      zanni098
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A local-first mission control for AI agent harnesses, providing a unified MCP gateway for shared memory, task queue, and encrypted secrets across multiple agents.
      4 npm
      1
      MIT

    • AHK

      RiccardoBonnet
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding providers to run structured multi-agent workflows with specification documents, tracked tasks, handoffs, health checks, and auditable repair modes through MCP tools. It coordinates task claims, action logs, lifecycle notices, and final completion evidence across supported providers.
      29 npm
      MIT

    • Agent Harness Kit

      Suzuki1440
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding providers to run structured multi-agent workflows with document-backed specifications, tracked tasks, handoffs, health gates, and completion evidence. It exposes MCP tools for coordinating use cases, specs, implementation, review, and repair across supported providers.
      29 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Context Every Agent Can ShareAgents share what they learn, hand off work, and keep it when you switch models. Start with 5 GB free.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 24 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Several tools have overlapping purposes: delegate, consensus, and swarm_run all invoke model-based text generation and can consume credits, while mission_status, mission_status_job, and mission_list all report mission-related state. Descriptions clarify the differences, but an agent could plausibly select the wrong tool in ambiguous situations.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    Naming conventions are mixed: some tools use verb_noun (list_models, discover_models, verify_model, project_init), some use noun_verb (swarm_run, mission_start, routing_explain, cost_estimate, health_check), and a few use bare nouns (delegate, consensus). All names are snake_case and readable, but the inconsistent ordering and verb placement make the pattern hard to predict.

    Tool Count3/5

    At 24 tools, the surface is large but not unreasonable given the broad scope covering mission orchestration, delegation, model routing, provider inventory, cost estimation, and health verification. It sits at the heavy end of the acceptable range and could benefit from consolidation.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the main workflows well: mission lifecycle (start, pause, resume, cancel, claim, release, status), delegation modes (delegate, consensus, swarm_run), routing and provider inspection, cost estimation, and health checks. Minor gaps exist, such as no direct mission editing or provider configuration mutation, but these are likely handled outside the MCP surface.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources