Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
LIN0304

Puffer Finance MCP

by LIN0304
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript

Related Servers

Alternatives to Puffer Finance MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Universal Crypto MCP

      nirholas
      F
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to interact with any EVM-compatible blockchain through natural language, supporting token swaps, cross-chain bridges, staking, lending, governance, gas optimization, and portfolio tracking across networks like Ethereum, BSC, Polygon, Arbitrum, and more.
      100
      21 npm
      44
      -

    • Arbitrum Bridge MCP Server

      WuodOdhis
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform cross-chain bridging operations using natural language intents, with support for multiple protocols (Across, Stargate) and advanced security features like oracle validation and slippage protection. Provides comprehensive bridging tools including quote estimation, transaction building, and approval management across Arbitrum and Ethereum networks.
      MIT
    • omniroute-bridge-mcp by c-viper-work

      omniroute-bridge-mcpofficial

      c-viper-work
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Cross-chain instant bridge, Polymarket & Hyperliquid one-click onboarding (USDC.e + POL on Polygon, HYPE on HyperEVM, and USDC on Arbitrum), and multi-wallet gas refuel MCP server powered by Relay Protocol across Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon, BSC, HyperEVM, and Solana.
      6
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.9/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    The bridge-related tools (create_everclear_intent, execute_bridge, puffer_bridge) have overlapping purposes and could easily be confused. Additionally, get_strategy_details and get_defi_strategies serve different granularities but may appear similar at a glance.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    The tools mix conventions: get_ is used for info retrieval, deposit_to and simulate_ are verb phrases, while puffer_bridge is not a standard verb construction, and create_everclear_intent includes a brand name. This inconsistency reduces predictability.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 9 tools, the server is well-scoped, covering strategies, vaults, and bridging without unnecessary bloat. Each tool appears purposeful and the count is within the ideal range.

    Completeness3/5

    The server covers core actions like depositing to strategies and executing bridges, but lacks withdrawal functionality or user position queries, which are common in DeFi contexts. These gaps could cause agents to hit dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources