Ultrabrain Export

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate the tool is read-only and idempotent. The description adds the output formats but does not disclose any additional behavioral traits (e.g., where output goes, side effects). With annotations carrying the safety profile, a score of 3 is appropriate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, immediately stating the action and outputs. It is front-loaded, efficient, and contains no extraneous information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the low complexity, thorough annotations, and complete schema, the description is adequate. It explains the purpose and output formats, though it does not specify the return behavior (e.g., file download vs. text response). Overall, it is sufficient for a simple export tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description lists the formats but does not add new meaning beyond what the schema provides. No additional parameter nuances are described.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (export), the resource (a session), and the output formats (markdown, text, JSON). It is specific and distinguishes this tool from its siblings, as no other sibling has an export function.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when an export is needed, but provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any exclusions or prerequisites. The context is clear but lacks directive depth.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.