Skip to main content
Glama
LBurny

CADPilot

by LBurny
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to CADPilot

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • freecad-tool-server

      mattackerman1
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to programmatically build, analyze, and export 3D CAD geometry using FreeCAD through REST or MCP tools.
      MIT

    • FreeCAD MCP Server

      Srdpersonal
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI to directly call FreeCAD for 3D modeling via the MCP protocol, providing 39 modeling tools including primitive creation, boolean operations, transformations, and export.
      3
      -

    • FreeCAD MCP

      Mizzzord
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI clients to create, edit, and export CAD models and drawings in a locally installed FreeCAD via MCP.
      3
      -

    • FreeCAD MCP

      fastmcp-me
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to control FreeCAD 3D modeling software, allowing creation and manipulation of 3D objects, execution of Python code, and interaction with FreeCAD's parts library through natural language.
      10
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 27 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct roles: cad vs execute_code, execute_code vs execute_code_async, and assemble vs assembly_session are clearly differentiated by scope and persistence. Some overlap remains among session, step_plan, step_control, and rollback-related operations, but descriptions provide enough guidance to select correctly.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The surface is predominantly snake_case, but conventions are mixed: many tools use verb_noun (create_document, get_topology), while several use bare nouns or vague labels (session, cad, step_plan, assembly_session). It remains readable, but there is no single predictable pattern.

    Tool Count2/5

    At 27 tools the set is heavy for the rubric's 3-15 sweet spot, with multiple clusters covering overlapping concerns (sessions/step journals, code execution, assembly workflows). Several capabilities could likely be consolidated, so the count exceeds what feels well-scoped.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage is broad: document creation/listing, modeling via cad, code execution, step planning/control, diagnostics, measurement, topology, alignment, anchors, and both one-shot and persistent assembly. Minor lifecycle gaps exist (e.g., explicit document close/delete or general import/export), but agents can work around them.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources