Skip to main content
Glama
etabs-mcp

etabs-mcp

by LATINALU

Related Servers

Alternatives to etabs-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Connects AI assistants to CSI ETABS for structural engineering tasks, enabling model creation, analysis, design, and seismic checks via the COM API.
      69
      10
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An agentic MCP server for CSI ETABS v22+ that enables AI agents to model, load, analyze, design, and inspect building structures through 60 curated engineering tools and live .NET reflection of the full 1,293-method OAPI. Includes offscreen 3D rendering of deformed shapes and D/C ratios, interactive database table editing, and background analysis execution.
      71
      20
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Connects an AI agent to an open CSI ETABS model through the official COM API, enabling natural-language requests for model queries, analysis, design checks, and report extraction while the agent searches API methods and runs sandboxed Python against the live model.
      9
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding assistants to directly control CSI ETABS for structural and seismic analysis, including model inspection, material/section definition, frame generation, solver execution, and result extraction through natural language.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to inspect models open in MIDAS Gen NX or MIDAS Civil NX, query tables and analysis results, capture window views, and preview then confirm limited model changes such as writing records or running analysis.
      16
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables users to control CSI ETABS structural engineering software through Claude, allowing model creation, status checks, and engineering checks via COM automation.
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.6/5.0

    Scored across 40 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct entity or action: list vs create vs define vs assign vs analyze vs query. Even closely related tools like load_patterns, add_load_pattern, and load_combinations are clearly separated by their purpose.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All tools share the etabs_ prefix, but the action style is mixed: noun-only names for queries (etabs_stories, etabs_points), verb+noun for actions (etabs_set_units, etabs_add_frame), and inconsistent creation verbs such as new_model, add_load_pattern, and define_rectangular_section.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 40 tools, the surface is far larger than the typical well-scoped 3–15 tool set. While ETABS is a complex domain, this many tools risks overwhelming agents and indicates the server is trying to cover too many operations.

    Completeness3/5

    The set covers a broad workflow: model creation, geometry, property definitions, load patterns/combinations, assignments, analysis, and results. However, critical gaps remain: there is no explicit tool to assign defined sections/materials to frame or area elements, and no update/delete operations for created objects.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues