Skip to main content
Glama
L-Chris

Parallel Search MCP

by L-Chris
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript

Related Servers

Alternatives to Parallel Search MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • web-mcp

      Chang-Tong
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for multi-engine web search and web page fetching, supporting parallel search, content extraction, and optional LLM-powered search summarization and deep search.
      5
      MIT

    • searxng-mcp

      88plug
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server for SearXNG that provides web search capabilities with concise model-visible output while preserving full result payloads in metadata. It supports search, parallel fetching, URL extraction, and research workflows through both local stdio and streamable HTTP transports.
      7
      4
      -

    • url-context-mcp

      SkillfulElectro
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that fetches web pages and extracts clean, AI-usable context from them, enabling tools for link discovery, content search, and integrated fetch-and-search operations.
      5
      12 npm
      1
      MIT

    • Nexus MCP Server

      adawalli
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A production-ready Model Context Protocol server that brings AI-powered web search directly into development environments, providing intelligent search results with proper citations in Claude Desktop, Cursor, or any MCP-compatible client.
      73 npm
      23
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    parallel_search and parallel_fetch have clearly distinct purposes: one performs web searches, the other extracts content from known URLs. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tool names follow a consistent parallel_<verb> pattern (search, fetch). The naming is predictable and uniform.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 2 tools, the server feels minimal, but the tools cover the two core actions for a search/retrieval service. The count is on the low end but not unreasonable.

    Completeness4/5

    The server provides search and fetch capabilities, covering the primary workflow of searching the web and extracting content from specific URLs. Minor gaps like pagination or result filtering are not explicit, but the core surface is complete for a focused search tool.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources