Skip to main content
Glama
Kvxw1105

lean-computer-use-mcp

by Kvxw1105
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to lean-computer-use-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • oswright

      Ask-812
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to automate real desktop applications across Windows, Linux, and macOS using incremental screen perception, accessibility trees, OCR, and window management, dramatically reducing token usage compared to screenshot-per-step approaches.
      39 PyPI
      3
      MIT

    • screen-use

      tongriyaotxt
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to see, locate UI elements, and operate any Windows desktop app through natural language, using accessibility-tree matching with optional vision-model fallback, plus an autonomous visual loop with introspection and meta-learning.
      3
      MIT

    • AI Process Manager

      aipm-engine
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to query Windows process, window, and console information via structured JSON instead of screenshots, reducing token usage by 94-98%.
      20
      36 npm
      1
      MIT

    • UI-Venus MCP

      q1820926174-cpu
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to automate GUI interactions across Windows, Linux, macOS, Android, iOS, and browsers using structured platform APIs first, with vision grounding as a fallback for robust cross-platform computer use.
      17
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Context Every Agent Can ShareAgents share what they learn, hand off work, and keep it when you switch models. Start with 5 GB free.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct role: finding apps, observing state, executing single actions, batch actions, and metrics. No functional overlap between tools, and the descriptions clearly differentiate them.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share the 'cu_' prefix and are short, but the second part mixes verbs (find, observe, act, batch) with a noun (metrics). This is a minor deviation from a consistent verb-focused pattern.

    Tool Count5/5

    With only 5 tools, the server is lean and well-scoped. Each tool handles a core capability (discover, observe, act, batch, monitor), and the count feels right for the stated purpose.

    Completeness5/5

    The tools cover the essential lifecycle for computer use: finding an app, observing its state, performing actions (single or batched), and tracking metrics. There are no obvious dead ends or missing core operations.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources