Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Purroxy

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Reliable, scalable browser infrastructure for AI agents. Route, pool, and failover across any browser provider. 8 built-in browser tools using raw Chrome CDP - navigate, screenshot, snapshot, interact, evaluate. Zero-config with auto Chrome detection & concurrent sessions support
    1,405 npm
    17
    MIT

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Gives Claude read access to Google Analytics 4, Google Search Console, and Microsoft Clarity data, with connections stored once and reusable across projects.
    8
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables Claude to securely access your own European bank accounts read-only via PSD2, letting you check balances, transactions, and set up alerts through natural language.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Give Claude direct access to your AWS account, SSH into your servers, run shell commands on your laptop, query your databases, and manage PM2 processes — all from a Claude chat. No Claude Code subscription needed. Your keys never leave your machine.
    2
    MIT
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Gives Claude access to a FreeAgent company, enabling read and write operations on contacts, projects, invoices, bills, and bank transactions with journaled undo support.
    -

TDQS

A4.4/5.0

Scored across 3 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: list_capabilities for discovery, run_capability for execution, and status for health checking. There is no overlap in functionality, making it easy for an agent to select the right tool for each task without confusion.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with the prefix 'purroxy_' (e.g., purroxy_list_capabilities, purroxy_run_capability, purroxy_status). This predictable naming scheme enhances readability and usability across the tool set.

Tool Count3/5

With only 3 tools, the set feels thin for a browser automation server, potentially lacking operations like managing capabilities (e.g., create, update, delete) or handling errors. However, it covers basic discovery, execution, and status checks, which is borderline but functional for its stated purpose.

Completeness3/5

The tools provide core functionality for listing and running capabilities, with a status check, but there are notable gaps: no tools for creating, updating, or deleting capabilities, and no error handling or session management tools. This limits the server's ability to fully manage browser automations, though basic workflows are supported.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessUnresponsive