Skip to main content
Glama

bear_health_check

Read-onlyIdempotent

Run a Bear notes health check to find duplicate titles, empty notes, trash issues, sync conflicts, orphaned tags, untagged notes, and oversized notes. Use results to clean up or diagnose sync issues.

Instructions

Run a health check on the Bear notes library. Reports duplicate titles, empty notes, notes stuck in trash, sync conflicts, orphaned tags, untagged notes, and oversized notes. Use this to identify cleanup opportunities or diagnose sync issues.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Implementation Reference

  • Registration of bear_health_check tool in the tools map. Defines tool name, description, empty inputSchema, annotations, and buildArgs (which builds CLI args ['health', '--json']).
    bear_health_check: {
      tool: {
        name: "bear_health_check",
        description:
          "Run a health check on the Bear notes library. Reports duplicate titles, empty notes, notes stuck in trash, sync conflicts, orphaned tags, untagged notes, and oversized notes. Use this to identify cleanup opportunities or diagnose sync issues.",
        inputSchema: {
          type: "object" as const,
          properties: {},
        },
        annotations: {
          readOnlyHint: true,
          destructiveHint: false,
          idempotentHint: true,
        },
      },
      buildArgs: () => ["health", "--json"],
    },
  • Generic handler in index.ts that routes all tool calls. For bear_health_check, it calls handler.buildArgs(params) (producing ['health', '--json']) and then executes via execBcliWithReauth. The JSON output from the bcli health command is parsed and returned as the tool result.
    server.setRequestHandler(CallToolRequestSchema, async (request) => {
      const { name, arguments: input } = request.params;
      const handler = tools[name];
    
      if (!handler) {
        return {
          content: [{ type: "text", text: `Unknown tool: ${name}` }],
          isError: true,
        };
      }
    
      const params = (input ?? {}) as Record<string, unknown>;
    
      // Validate bear_edit_note: need at least one edit operation
      if (name === "bear_edit_note") {
        const hasAppend = params.append_text !== undefined;
        const hasBody = params.body !== undefined;
        const hasSetFm = params.set_frontmatter !== undefined &&
          Object.keys(params.set_frontmatter as object).length > 0;
        const hasRemoveFm = Array.isArray(params.remove_frontmatter) &&
          (params.remove_frontmatter as unknown[]).length > 0;
        const hasFm = hasSetFm || hasRemoveFm;
    
        if (!hasAppend && !hasBody && !hasFm) {
          return {
            content: [
              {
                type: "text",
                text: "Provide 'append_text', 'body', 'set_frontmatter', or 'remove_frontmatter'.",
              },
            ],
            isError: true,
          };
        }
        if (hasAppend && hasBody) {
          return {
            content: [
              {
                type: "text",
                text: "Provide either 'append_text' or 'body', not both.",
              },
            ],
            isError: true,
          };
        }
      }
    
      try {
        const args = handler.buildArgs(params);
        let result: { stdout: string; stderr: string };
    
        // Check if this tool needs stdin piping
        const stdinData = handler.usesStdin?.(params) ?? null;
        if (stdinData !== null) {
          result = await execBcliWithStdinAndReauth(args, stdinData);
        } else {
          result = await execBcliWithReauth(args);
        }
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false, and idempotentHint=true. The description adds specifics about what checks are performed, which is useful context but does not disclose additional behavioral traits like output format or performance considerations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences: first states the tool's action, second lists reported issues and usage guidance. No filler, front-loaded for quick understanding.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with no parameters and no output schema, the description fully covers its purpose, what it reports, and when to use it. Annotations already cover safety, so no gaps remain.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema has zero parameters, so the description need not add parameter details. Baseline for 0 params is 4. The description does not repeat schema information.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool runs a health check on the Bear notes library and enumerates specific issues it reports (duplicate titles, empty notes, etc.). It is unique among sibling tools, which are all note management operations, so it distinguishes itself effectively.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly recommends using the tool 'to identify cleanup opportunities or diagnose sync issues.' This provides clear context but does not mention when not to use or alternatives, though none are needed given the tool's specialty.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/KuvopLLC/better-bear'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server