gutfeel-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to gutfeel-mcp
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables agents to get fast, calibrated probabilistic answers from Jev (Typesafe AI) to yes/no, scale, or choice questions about provided material, without using a generative model.1208 npm2MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables local bounded decision-making through MCP using a resident Core ML model, with tools for single decisions, batched decisions, and conservative context filtering.42Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables Claude Code and Claude Desktop to command the jev-ultrafast browser agent in your real Chrome, autonomously pursuing plain-language goals on a given start URL while enforcing a domain-bound safeguard.3MIT
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables local, LLM-free probabilistic decisions (choice, classification, scoring, yes/no) with real probabilities in 100+ languages, as a drop-in replacement for jev-local tools.4MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to obtain typed judgments from TypeSafe's Jev System One models, including yes/no probabilities, multiple-choice selections with distributions, and rubric-based scores, directly usable in code.52AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to offload yes/no, multiple-choice, and scoring questions to TypeSafe's Jev, returning compact confidence-scored answers to save tokens and improve speed.1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to make fast, zero-output-token decisions by evaluating context, diffs, logs, or options through the OpenRouter Decisions API using TypeSafe Jev, returning calibrated probabilities for binary, categorical, or scoring questions.1552 npm4MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceConnect AI agents to Jev AI (jev-ai.pro) for classification, scoring, yes/no checks, advisory action assessment, batched typed decisions and saved judges. Returns structured answers and probabilities using your Jev AI API key.6MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables Claude Code agents to perform structured decision-making through TypeSafe Jev, supporting yes/no checks, route selection, scoring, and batched multi-question judgments with confidence values.1-
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
likely, classify, and rate have clearly distinct output types (binary truth, categorical label, ordinal score). 'each' overlaps as a batch version of all three, which could cause some confusion if the description is not read, but its purpose is clarified as handling many texts at once.
Names are all lowercase single words but mix parts of speech: classify and rate are verbs, while likely is an adjective and each is a determiner. There is no consistent verb_noun or action-oriented pattern, making the set less predictable.
Four tools is a lean but appropriate set for a focused text-judgment service. Each tool covers a distinct primitive or batch variant, with no obvious redundancy.
The surface covers binary judgment, multi-class classification, ordinal rating, and batch versions of all three, forming a complete core for quick text judgments. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no explicit pairwise comparison or human escalation for classify/rate), but agents can work around them.