Stop recording

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits. It states the basic action and return but does not explain side effects, behavior when no recording is active, the meaning of the 'confirm' parameter, or any safety/permissions aspects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single efficient sentence that immediately states the action and result. However, it omits critical parameter information, which prevents a higher score.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple but not fully specified. The description covers the main purpose but leaves the 'confirm' parameter unexplained and does not address preconditions or failure cases. Given the output schema exists, return values are less critical, but the missing parameter semantics and lack of behavioral context make it incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the 'confirm' parameter is not mentioned in the description at all. The description adds no meaning beyond the raw schema, leaving the agent without understanding of what confirm does.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies the verb 'stop' and the resource 'current recording', and also states the return value (saved file path). This distinguishes it from related tools like pause_recording or start_recording.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., pause_recording for temporary stop). There is no mention of preconditions such as requiring an active recording or when the 'confirm' parameter should be used.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.