cancel_order
Cancel an active order by providing its order ID. Remove pending trades from the system instantly.
Instructions
Cancel a working order by its order_id (from get_open_orders).
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| order_id | Yes |
Cancel an active order by providing its order ID. Remove pending trades from the system instantly.
Cancel a working order by its order_id (from get_open_orders).
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| order_id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose all behavioral traits. It does not mention idempotency, error conditions, side effects, or return behavior, leaving gaps for an AI agent.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, well-structured sentence that front-loads the action and parameter, with no unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description covers the core purpose and parameter source but omits common behavioral details like response confirmation or error handling, making it minimally adequate.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The description adds value to the schema by indicating the order_id is obtained from get_open_orders, which is not present in the schema definition (0% coverage). This provenance helps the agent correctly use the parameter.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool's action: 'Cancel a working order'. It specifies the required parameter (order_id) and its source (from get_open_orders), differentiating it from sibling tools like place_order or get_open_orders.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage context by referencing get_open_orders as the source of the order_id, but does not explicitly state when to use this tool over alternatives or provide exclusion criteria.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Kris-Wang05/ibkr-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server