Skip to main content
Glama
KpihX

bw-proxy

by KpihX

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{
  "listChanged": false
}
prompts
{
  "listChanged": false
}
resources
{
  "subscribe": false,
  "listChanged": false
}
experimental
{}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
get_vault_mapD
propose_vault_transactionD
get_proxy_audit_contextD
inspect_transaction_logD
compare_secrets_batchD
find_item_duplicatesD
find_duplicates_batchD
get_templateD
find_all_vault_duplicatesD
refactor_item_secretsD

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

D1.5/5.0

Scored across 10 tools

Disambiguation2/5

Multiple tools focus on finding duplicates (find_all_vault_duplicates, find_duplicates_batch, find_item_duplicates) with unclear scope distinctions. Without descriptions, an agent would likely struggle to choose between them.

Naming Consistency2/5

Naming patterns are inconsistent: some start with 'find', some with 'get', others with different verbs (compare, inspect, propose, refactor). The placement of 'batch' varies, and there is no consistent verb_noun structure.

Tool Count4/5

10 tools is a reasonable count for a specialized secret management proxy. It covers a variety of operations without being excessive, though some categories are overrepresented.

Completeness2/5

The tool set lacks basic CRUD operations (create, read, update, delete) for items or vaults. Advanced operations like proposing transactions and refactoring are present, but foundational actions are missing, leaving significant gaps.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues