import_generated_asset_hunyuan

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description is the sole source of behavioral info. It explains that the asset will be imported into the scene with the given object name and returns success/failure. However, it does not disclose potential side effects like overwriting existing objects or any required permissions, leaving some behavioral gaps.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise and well-structured: a one-sentence purpose, a two-item parameter list, and a return statement. Every line adds value with no redundancy or filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and no annotations, the description covers the purpose, parameters, and return value adequately. It could mention error handling or how to obtain the zip_file_url more explicitly, but for a simple import tool it is reasonably complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has zero coverage (no descriptions in the schema), so the description fully compensates by explaining both parameters: 'name' is the object name in the scene, and 'zip_file_url' is the URL from the generation step. This provides essential semantic context beyond the bare schema titles.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool imports an asset generated by Hunyuan3D, using a specific verb and resource. It mentions the timing (after generation task) and the source (Hunyuan3D), which helps distinguish it from the generic sibling 'import_generated_asset', though it does not explicitly contrast them.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear usage context: it should be used after the generation task is completed, and the zip_file_url should be taken from the generation step. This implicitly differentiates it from other import tools, though it doesn't mention specific alternatives or say when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.