A
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceAn MCP server that connects AI assistants to Xray Cloud for Jira test management, enabling natural language interaction with tests, test plans, executions, and CI result imports.
MIT
Xray MCP
by Korfu
Related Servers
Alternatives to Xray MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Xray Cloud test management that enables importing automation results and managing tests, test executions, and test sets in Jira.MIT
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for self-hosted Jira, enabling task management, searching issues, adding comments, transitioning statuses, and logging worklogs directly from Cursor.121-
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server for integrating with Atlassian products including Confluence, Jira, Bitbucket, and Xray for Jira, enabling AI-powered operations like searching, creating, and updating issues, pages, and test results.7327MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that integrates JIRA directly into Cursor IDE, allowing users to view assigned issues, get detailed information on specific tickets, and convert JIRA issues into local tasks without leaving their editor.1422 npm6TypeScriptMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceMCP server for Zephyr Scale test management tool, enabling test case, test plan, test cycle, and test execution management.40 npm2MIT
TDQS
A3.5/5.0
Scored across 24 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool targets a distinct Xray entity or action (test, test plan, test execution, test set, import format), with clear naming and descriptions preventing confusion. The only potential overlap (get_test vs get_test_with_steps) is resolved by explicit distinction in descriptions.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., create_test, get_test_plan, import_cucumber_results). The pattern is predictable and matches standard CRUD operations plus imports/exports.
Tool Count4/5
24 tools is slightly high but justified for a comprehensive test management server covering multiple entity types and import/export formats. Each tool serves a distinct purpose, and the count aligns with the domain's complexity.
Completeness3/5
The tool set covers essential CRUD for tests, test plans, test executions, and test sets, plus imports/exports for various formats. However, delete operations for test plans, executions, and test sets are missing, leaving a notable gap in lifecycle coverage.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues