wraith-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to wraith-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA stealth-enhanced browser automation MCP server for AI agents to interact with websites while bypassing anti-bot detection mechanisms like Cloudflare and reCAPTCHA.8MIT
- AlicenseCqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides a stealth-enhanced Playwright browser automation engine with anti-detection features, enabling AI agents to navigate websites, interact with elements, and bypass anti-bot systems.241Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI assistants to control a real browser with your existing sessions and extensions, avoiding bot detection and authentication hurdles.101Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI-powered browser automation, web scraping, and testing using Playwright across Chromium, Firefox, and WebKit. It allows users to perform actions like navigation, clicking, typing, and taking screenshots through natural language interfaces.6 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables AI assistants to control a real web browser with stealth capabilities, avoiding bot detection while performing tasks like clicking, filling forms, taking screenshots, and extracting data.1125 npm26MIT

@meshbrow/mcp-serverofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for Meshbrow that gives AI agents full browser automation capabilities with stealth anti-detection, enabling natural language control of browser sessions, data extraction, and multi-browser fleets.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 17 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes: navigation, interaction, content reading, screenshots, PDFs, downloads, and session management are all separate. The only potential confusion is between browse, extract, and navigate, but their descriptions make the distinction clear.
Naming is mixed: some tools use bare verbs (browse, scroll, navigate, click, extract), others use verb_noun (type_text, get_content, close_session), and a couple are nouns used as commands (tabs, screenshot). The style is readable but not uniform.
With 17 tools, this is slightly above the ideal 3-15 range, but each tool covers a distinct browser or session operation, making the count justified. It feels a bit heavy but not excessive.
The server covers the core browser lifecycle well: navigation, interaction, content extraction, screenshots, PDFs, downloads, persistent sessions, and tabs. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no explicit history or wait commands), but workflows are largely complete.