Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to llm-vault-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to scan and audit environment files for leaked secrets, sanitize them, encrypt/decrypt vaults, and run processes with zero-disk secret injection.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to stage API keys into non-exposing handles and make API calls where the real key is injected locally, so secrets stay out of prompts, transcripts, tool arguments, and logs. Also allows listing handles, revoking secrets, and inspecting vault info without ever returning raw secret values.
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Local AES-256-GCM encrypted vault for AI agents. Resolve {{PLACEHOLDER}} secrets in prompts at runtime — LLMs never see real API keys. Argon2id key derivation, zero cloud.
      2
      131 npm
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Agent Vault is a local credential vault for AI agents. It enables agents to use secrets by name without ever seeing their values, with host allowlists, output scrubbing, and audit logging.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to securely store and manage encrypted secrets locally while using them indirectly through environment-variable injection or file writes, so plaintext values never enter the agent's context.
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Lets AI coding agents read project documentation and secret metadata, then use credentials by injecting them into child processes while redacting the values from all output. Agents can deploy, migrate databases, or SSH using real secrets without the values ever entering their context, transcripts, or logs.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 19 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target clearly distinct resources or actions, but vault_run_command and vault_inject_env overlap heavily: both inject secret/lease handles into a subprocess environment and return scrubbed output. Other adjacent pairs like get vs lease and scan vs absorb remain distinguishable from their descriptions.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Every tool uses lower snake_case with a consistent vault_ prefix, and the verb/noun structure is predictable across the set. There is no mixing of naming conventions.

    Tool Count4/5

    19 tools is somewhat heavy, but the scope includes vault access, leasing, execution, import, scanning, audit, and external integrations, so most tools earn their place. The main redundancy is the run-command vs inject-env overlap.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers create, read, lease, delete, audit, scanning, and integrations well, but there is no explicit secret update/rotate operation or tag-mutation tool. Agents can work around rotation by deleting and recreating or absorbing secrets again, so these are notable but not fatal gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues