Scored across 9 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct domain, and the descriptions explicitly cross-reference boundaries (e.g. ppt_read vs ppt_inspect, ppt_edit vs ppt_graphics vs ppt_tables). While ppt_read and ppt_inspect are both read-only, the split between slide content reads and audits/deck-level facts is well defined and reinforced.
All tools use a consistent ppt_<category> prefix, with no mixing of camelCase, hyphens, or unrelated verb styles. The naming is predictable and readable across the entire set.
Nine tools is well within a reasonable range for a PowerPoint automation server, and each tool maps to a coherent functional area rather than being redundant. The heavy operation count is internal to each tool and does not inflate the tool-level count.
The surface covers the full PowerPoint lifecycle: reading, auditing, editing text and slides, graphics and media, tables and charts, design and themes, review comments, deck-level operations and export, plus help. No obvious CRUD or workflow gap is apparent from the tool set.