Get Product By Id
getProductByIdRetrieve a product by its numeric ID to access its full details.
Instructions
Fetches a single product by its numeric id.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes |
getProductByIdRetrieve a product by its numeric ID to access its full details.
Fetches a single product by its numeric id.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It only states the basic action without disclosing error behavior (e.g., not found), authentication requirements, rate limits, or side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single, direct sentence with no redundant words. Every word is necessary.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple one-parameter tool, the description is minimally adequate. However, given the lack of output schema and annotations, it does not fully inform the agent about possible return values or error states.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, yet the description adds no meaning beyond the schema itself: 'numeric id' simply restates the integer type. No details on format, range, or purpose.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb ('Fetches') and resource ('single product') with a clear identifier ('numeric id'). It distinguishes from sibling tools like getProducts (list) and searchProducts (by criteria).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as searchProducts or getProducts. No mention of prerequisites (e.g., having the ID) or context for exclusion.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/KirillSerchenko/mcp-custom-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server