Skip to main content
Glama
Kio-pon

innoslate-mcp

by Kio-pon
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to innoslate-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • byob

      wxtsky
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Lets AI assistants control your real Chrome browser to perform web tasks like reading pages, taking screenshots, clicking, and typing, using your existing logged-in sessions.
      132
      MIT

    • Chrome MCP Server

      femto
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to control and automate your Chrome browser directly, leveraging existing login states and configurations for tasks like content analysis, semantic search across tabs, screenshots, network monitoring, and interactive operations.
      12
      MIT

    • Chrome MCP Server

      marie6789040106650
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Transforms Chrome browser into an AI-controlled automation tool that allows AI assistants like Claude to access browser functionality, enabling complex automation, content analysis, and semantic search while preserving your existing browser environment.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Give agents eyes on the webHosted screenshot MCP. Send a URL, get a pixel-perfect image. $0.002 per grab. Works with Claude, Cursor, and Codex.grabbit.liveAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 18 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes (search vs. get, local files vs. workspace files, schema vs. survey). The main potential confusion is innoslate_apply (bulk create/update) versus innoslate_update (single entity by id), though the descriptions distinguish them well.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Nearly all tools use a consistent innoslate_ prefix with readable verb/noun forms. The two local-file tools (list_local_files, read_local_file) drop the prefix, a minor but noticeable deviation from the otherwise consistent convention.

    Tool Count4/5

    18 tools is on the heavier side but each maps to a distinct capability (auth, survey, read, search, write, lint, quality, report). The set is well-scoped for a full project-management workflow rather than padded.

    Completeness5/5

    The surface covers the full lifecycle: login/status, project survey, schema discovery, search/read, document trees, comments, lint, quality check, reports, file attachment, and verified bulk/single writes. Deletion is intentionally excluded, but no meaningful read or write operation appears to be missing.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources