Skip to main content
Glama
KiaTheRandomGuy

PasarGuard MCP

Related Servers

Alternatives to PasarGuard MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for safely inspecting and operating a local Caddy admin API. Provides read-only tools and dry-run mutations for config management.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Local MCP server for inspecting and managing an allowlisted Discord server via Discord's REST API, with safety modes, idempotent JSON blueprints, and destructive-operation safeguards.
      27
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables unified access to multiple MCP backend servers through one local daemon, with curated per-client tool profiles, allow/deny policies, audit logging, and drift protection.
      9 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for interacting with a self-hosted Appsmith instance via its REST API, enabling read/update/create of pages, queries, JS objects, widgets, datasources, and applications with lazy session management and destructive-operation gating.
      30
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for Proxmox VE and Proxmox Datacenter Manager, covering every API endpoint via six consolidated tools for list, describe, and call operations with a read-only safety gate.
      6
      19 npm
      2
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provider-agnostic MCP server for managing heterogeneous infrastructure (SSH, Proxmox VE, Virtualizor, Hetzner Cloud, Cloudflare) via a JSON inventory, exposing tools for VM/container management, DNS, firewalls, and SSH operations.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 22 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct resource-action pairs (e.g., plan_create_node vs. plan_update_core), and read tools are clearly separated from planning tools. Some ambiguity exists between plan_node_action and plan_update_core since plan_node_action can also update a core, and plan_delete_resource is generic, but descriptions mitigate this.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The naming follows a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., plan_create_node, get_panel_inventory, apply_change). Minor inconsistencies include 'list_panel_resource' (singular generic) and 'plan_rollback' not matching the plan_create/update pattern, but overall the convention is predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 22 tools, the server is on the heavier side, which can be overwhelming but is justified by the breadth of PasarGuard management. The count is within the 'heavy' range (16-25) rather than extreme, so it earns a middle score.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers create, read, update, delete, planning, applying, rollback, and monitoring for core PasarGuard resources. Minor gaps exist, such as no explicit tool to list planned changes or cancel a plan, but these are workarounds via inspect_change and apply_change.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues