Create Location

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate the tool is not read-only (readOnlyHint=false) and not destructive (destructiveHint=false), so 'Create' adds little beyond that. The description does not disclose side effects, permission requirements, or uniqueness constraints, failing to provide value beyond the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise, with a clear purpose sentence followed by a bulleted list of arguments. Every word is necessary, and no redundant information is present.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers parameters well but lacks details on the return object beyond 'Created Location object with ID'. No output schema exists, so more information about the response structure or potential errors would improve completeness. The four parameters are adequately described.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Despite low schema coverage (25%), the description explains each parameter's meaning and provides an example for geolocation_geojson, which the schema also describes. This adds significant clarity for all four parameters, compensating for the schema gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Create' and the resource 'location' with an example ('assembly point'). It distinguishes this tool from sibling tools like sia_create_area and sia_create_crop_zone by naming the specific entity and service.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies when to use (to create a location) but provides no explicit guidance on when not to use or alternatives. No prerequisites or exclusions are mentioned, relying on the agent to infer from context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.