Skip to main content
Glama
KevinRabun

Judges Panel

by KevinRabun
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Judges Panel

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • corbat by corbat-tech

      corbatofficial

      corbat-tech
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Policy and quality engine for AI coding agents that enforces team coding standards and provides validation gates for agent-assisted software delivery.
      7
      34 npm
      4
      MIT

    • MCP Code Crosscheck

      olaservo
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables AI-assisted code review with bias mitigation strategies through cross-model evaluation and bias-aware prompting. Detects AI-generated code from commit authors and provides structured reviews with security, performance, and maintainability analysis.
      -

    • Argus MCP

      lokafinnsw
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI-powered, zero-trust code review with multiple models, supporting single files, git diffs, and multiple files, with security, performance, and architecture checks across 10+ languages.
      13
      MIT

    • CodeBase Optimizer

      liadgez
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides comprehensive codebase analysis including project structure evaluation, cross-language duplicate detection, microservices validation, and configuration optimization with AI-powered pattern learning that generates actionable improvement reports.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 25 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The tools cover distinct functionalities (evaluation, dependency analysis, benchmarking, scaffolding, file ops, feedback), but the many evaluate_* variants (evaluate_code, evaluate_code_streaming, evaluate_diff, etc.) could be confused despite descriptive differences.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern (e.g., evaluate_code, fix_code, list_files), with 'evaluate_' heavily used. Minor deviations like benchmark_gate and session_status are exceptions.

    Tool Count3/5

    At 25 tools, the count is on the higher end but still reasonable given the server's broad scope (code evaluation, dependency analysis, benchmarking, scaffolding, etc.). Could be streamlined.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers evaluation, fixing, dependency analysis, benchmarking, feedback, and scaffolding comprehensively. Minor gaps: no tool to update triage decisions or evaluate arbitrary specific lines outside diffs.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources