Skip to main content
Glama
Keremozdemirra

eudr-scope-mcp

by Keremozdemirra
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to eudr-scope-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • cbam-mcp

      Keremozdemirra
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables users to query EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism data offline: whether a Combined Nomenclature code is in scope, which default emission values apply for a given country of origin, and what the code describes. Every answer cites the legally binding act, the dated data version, and flags that the data itself is not legally binding.
      5
      MIT

    • cellar-wrapper

      Kymylyy
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A community-maintained MCP server that simplifies access to EU legal and legislative data from the CELLAR service, supporting lookups, metadata retrieval, relation checks, and monitoring.
      2
      MIT

    • Receita Federal: Radar

      mcp-dir
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables querying official Brazilian Federal Revenue data on foreign trade habilitation (Radar), allowing users to check habilitation status directly from the official source. Read-only MCP server with a single consultation tool.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The tools mostly target distinct functions: commodity-level Annex I lookup, CN-code scope lookup, application dates, country risk, and legal sources. commodity_codes and eudr_scope both involve Annex I and CN codes, so an agent could occasionally hesitate, but the descriptions clearly differentiate bulk commodity listing from a specific code check.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names use lower snake_case and are descriptive noun phrases, so the style is broadly consistent. There are minor deviations in plurality and specificity, such as commodity_codes versus sources, and no verb_noun pattern, but the set remains predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools are well-scoped for an EUDR scope-information server. Each tool covers a distinct lookup or metadata need without obvious redundancy or bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers key EUDR scope dimensions: Annex I commodity entries, relevant-product status, application dates, country risk, and legal sourcing. Minor gaps exist, such as no dedicated tool to list all commodities or all country-risk classifications, but the core informational workflows are covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources