eu-taxonomy-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to eu-taxonomy-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables users to query EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism data offline: whether a Combined Nomenclature code is in scope, which default emission values apply for a given country of origin, and what the code describes. Every answer cites the legally binding act, the dated data version, and flags that the data itself is not legally binding.5MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables querying a local copy of the EU ETS Union Registry to search installations by name, country or activity, trace any installation's yearly verified emissions, free allocation and surrendered units, aggregate company installations by LEI, and rank top emitters, each answer carrying the snapshot date and attribution.5MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server exposing NACE Rev. 2.1 economic activity classification codes for AI agents, with tools to browse, search, and fuzzy-match codes.447 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables checking whether a CN code is an EU Deforestation Regulation relevant product, when the obligations apply by operator type, and the risk level of a country, with answers citing the article, act and consolidated version used. It serves the current Annex I, application dates and country classifications as an MCP server and command line, applying amendments not yet consolidated.5MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables users to determine whether an undertaking is in scope of the EU CSRD and from which financial year, returning a cited chain of rules and flagging issues that depend on national law. It runs offline and can show the article behind each scope step.4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAcquis gives your assistant exact, verifiable access to EU digital regulation. Instead of paraphrasing from training data, it returns the verbatim provision of the current consolidated version — with the full citation (act, article, paragraph, point), its in-force status, the consolidation date, and a deep link to EUR-Lex so every claim can be checked. The legal text is rendered from the signed cMIT
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Most tools target distinct operations: sector listing, activity search, activity detail, criteria text, NACE matching, and provenance. search_activities and nace_lookup overlap on NACE-code lookups, and get_activity/criteria are closely related, but the descriptions clearly steer usage.
Three tools use a verb_noun pattern (list_sectors, search_activities, get_activity), but criteria, nace_lookup, and sources break the pattern with noun or noun_verb forms. The names remain readable and predictable enough.
Six tools is well-scoped for a read-only EU Taxonomy query server. Each tool maps to a distinct query need without obvious bloat.
The surface covers sectors, activity search/detail, criteria, NACE lookup, and provenance/legal sources. A minor gap is the lack of an explicit list-all-activities operation without search terms, though agents can likely work around it via search.