log_bottle
Record a bottle feeding event with amount, type, and notes for a specific child.
Instructions
Log a bottle feeding
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| child_uid | Yes | ||
| start | Yes | ||
| amount | Yes | ||
| bottle_type | Yes | ||
| units | Yes | ||
| notes | No |
Record a bottle feeding event with amount, type, and notes for a specific child.
Log a bottle feeding
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| child_uid | Yes | ||
| start | Yes | ||
| amount | Yes | ||
| bottle_type | Yes | ||
| units | Yes | ||
| notes | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description must convey behavioral traits. It only states the action without disclosing what is logged, if existing data is affected, or required permissions. Minimal transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
While extremely concise, the description is under-specified for a tool with 6 parameters and no other explanatory context. It lacks necessary structure and details.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the complexity of 6 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the single phrase description is grossly insufficient for an AI agent to understand the tool's behavior and requirements.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain any of the 6 parameters. The tool name and description offer no insight into parameter meaning.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Log a bottle feeding' clearly states the verb and resource, distinguishing it from sibling tools like log_diaper or log_solids. However, it lacks any elaboration on scope or specific context.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool over alternatives like log_nursing or log_solids. There are no usage conditions or exclusions mentioned.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/KenLSM/node-huckleberry-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server