get_item
Retrieves detailed information about a specific item in Jama Connect using its item ID.
Instructions
アイテムの詳細を取得する
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| item_id | Yes |
Retrieves detailed information about a specific item in Jama Connect using its item ID.
アイテムの詳細を取得する
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| item_id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description should disclose behaviors like required permissions or error handling. It only states the tool gets item details, failing to mention any potential side effects or constraints.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is concise (single sentence) but not well-structured; it lacks a summary or key points upfront. It earns its place but could be more informative.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simplicity (1 parameter, no output schema, no annotations), the description is inadequate. It does not cover return values, error conditions, or edge cases like missing items.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The parameter 'item_id' is undocumented. The description adds no meaning to the schema, which has 0% coverage. Essential information like valid item ID format or source is missing.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly indicates the tool retrieves details of an item, differentiating it from get_items (list) and search_items. However, it lacks specifics on what details are returned.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus sibling tools like search_items or get_items. The description does not mention prerequisites or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/KeisukeShima/mcp-jama'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server