Skip to main content
Glama
Keel-Official

keel-mcp

Related Servers

Alternatives to keel-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Exposes 17 read-only tools from six XRPL-Utilities services so AI agents can access XRPL wallet analysis, signal feeds, macro telemetry, permissioned asset stacks, RWA tracking, and ETF flow data.
      41
      109 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to check DeFi liquidation risk levels for lending protocols like Aave, Compound, and Morpho, including at-risk positions, liquidation prices, current prices, and aggregate exposure. Access is pay-per-call via x402 micropayments with USDC on Base, requiring no API key or signup.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to access real-time crypto risk intelligence with two tools: Flare for precursor detection and Core for overall risk environment assessment.
      4
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Provides DeFi vault risk analytics for AI agents to search, compare, and perform due diligence on over 700 vaults across major protocols like Morpho and Aave. It enables natural language analysis of risk scores, platform security, and portfolio-level risk assessments.
      9
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to query liquidation radar for seven tokens, inspect recorded BTC/ETH order book depth with wall history and aggressor flow, and request Li.Fi cross-chain swap routes that agents sign themselves.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides read-only Robinhood Chain market intelligence so AI agents can inspect token liquidity, simulate and compare size-aware exit pressure against observed pool depth, and explain the resulting grades with evidence and limits.
      5
      11
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct query: engine status, asset inventory, code resolution, per-asset risk, collateral comparison, trade depth, history, comparison, and methodology. The only mild overlap is between get_asset_risk (full reading including depth rungs) and estimate_trade_depth (bracket for a given size), but their stated purposes differ enough to guide selection.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Nearly all names follow a verb_noun pattern (list_assets, find_asset, get_asset_risk, check_collateral_size, estimate_trade_depth, get_risk_history, compare_assets, get_methodology). The lone exception is keel_status, which uses a server-name prefix instead of a verb, a minor deviation.

    Tool Count5/5

    Nine tools is well-scoped for a read-only risk analytics server, with each tool covering a distinct query type (inventory, detail, history, comparison, methodology). No redundant or filler tools.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the full read lifecycle for the domain: health, asset discovery, resolution, risk readings, historical reconstruction, comparison, collateral sizing, depth estimation, and methodology. There is no alert/watchlist or portfolio-level monitoring capability, but for a query-oriented analytics server the coverage is strong.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues