Skip to main content
Glama
KazKozDev

footnote-mcp

by KazKozDev
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to footnote-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • tapsite

      mgriffen
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server for web intelligence extraction that provides 55 tools for extracting structured data, design systems, accessibility audits, and more from websites.
      49 npm
      2
      MIT

    • @chenpu17/web-bridge-mcp

      chenpu17
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server for web search, web fetching, and Context7 documentation tools with proxy support, designed for internal network environments.
      4
      13 npm
      4
      MIT

    • Google Search MCP Server

      1999AZZAR
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Provides advanced Google Custom Search functionality, web content extraction, and specialized research tools such as search analytics, multi-site search, and fact checking. Works as an MCP server compatible with any MCP client.
      10
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Let your AI agent see the webWeb-to-screenshot MCP for Claude, Cursor and Codex. No cookie banners. Free to start.snap-render.comAd

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 42 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, but there is some overlap among table-extraction tools (web_extract_tables vs browser_extract_tables) and search tools (web_search, web_search_recent, web_deep_search, scholarly_search). However, descriptions differentiate them effectively.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Tool names follow a mix of patterns: many start with 'web_' or 'browser_', but there is no consistent verb_noun structure. Some names are compound verbs (e.g., 'reconcile_time_series', 'locate_claim_span'), while others are descriptive nouns (e.g., 'startup_health_check'). This inconsistency can be confusing.

    Tool Count3/5

    42 tools is high for a single server, but the domain (web research, extraction, validation) is broad. Each tool seems purposeful, but the count pushes the boundary of what is manageable and may lead to agent confusion.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers a wide range of operations: search, fetch, extract, parse, browser interaction, data validation, evidence handling, and recipe management. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no explicit tool for complex browser workflows beyond tables), but overall it is comprehensive.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources