Abscissa
Related Servers
Alternatives to Abscissa
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server for Linear that provides tools to manage issues, projects, comments, cycles, teams, and users via GraphQL, with OAuth2 authentication through Dedalus.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceAn MCP server for managing Linear issues, projects, teams, and milestones through the Model Context Protocol. It enables users to create, update, and list workspace resources including issue statuses, comments, and user details.17 npmISC
- AlicenseBqualityFmaintenanceMCP server for accessing and managing Linear resources like issues, projects, and comments with full CRUD operations and search.2154 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server providing tools to manage Linear projects and issues, including creation, listing, viewing details, and deletion, as well as team and user info retrieval.210 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceCustom MCP server for Linear that enables managing issues, projects, and workspaces through natural language, backed by raw GraphQL.210 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceMulti-workspace Linear MCP server using Personal API Keys instead of OAuth. Provides tools for managing issues, projects, teams, and more across multiple workspaces.5727 PyPI1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 42 tools
Most tools map cleanly to a distinct resource-action pair, such as issue, project, cycle, label, and team. The main ambiguity is between update_project and update_project_details, whose boundaries are not immediately obvious from names alone, though their descriptions help.
Tool names overwhelmingly follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern like create_issue, list_cycles, and archive_project. Minor deviations such as set_issue_project and update_project_details are understandable but slightly break the otherwise predictable convention.
With 42 tools, this server has a very large surface for agent selection. While individual tools are meaningful, the count crosses the threshold where it becomes heavy and likely to create decision overhead.
The server provides broad lifecycle coverage for issues, projects, cycles, labels, dependencies, and comments. Minor gaps exist, such as no delete operation for reusable project labels and no update operation for project updates, but core workflows are well supported.