Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Abscissa

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for Linear that provides tools to manage issues, projects, comments, cycles, teams, and users via GraphQL, with OAuth2 authentication through Dedalus.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      An MCP server for managing Linear issues, projects, teams, and milestones through the Model Context Protocol. It enables users to create, update, and list workspace resources including issue statuses, comments, and user details.
      17 npm
      ISC
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Custom MCP server for Linear that enables managing issues, projects, and workspaces through natural language, backed by raw GraphQL.
      210 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Multi-workspace Linear MCP server using Personal API Keys instead of OAuth. Provides tools for managing issues, projects, teams, and more across multiple workspaces.
      57
      27 PyPI
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 42 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools map cleanly to a distinct resource-action pair, such as issue, project, cycle, label, and team. The main ambiguity is between update_project and update_project_details, whose boundaries are not immediately obvious from names alone, though their descriptions help.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names overwhelmingly follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern like create_issue, list_cycles, and archive_project. Minor deviations such as set_issue_project and update_project_details are understandable but slightly break the otherwise predictable convention.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 42 tools, this server has a very large surface for agent selection. While individual tools are meaningful, the count crosses the threshold where it becomes heavy and likely to create decision overhead.

    Completeness4/5

    The server provides broad lifecycle coverage for issues, projects, cycles, labels, dependencies, and comments. Minor gaps exist, such as no delete operation for reusable project labels and no update operation for project updates, but core workflows are well supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues