Skip to main content
Glama
Kaushalendra-Marcus

evident

by Kaushalendra-Marcus
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to evident

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • extrapify

      christ0pper
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Structured web context infrastructure for AI agents. Extract reliable schema-guided JSON from websites using Claude-powered parsing, Browserless fallback rendering, and MCP-native workflows.
      1
      1
      MIT
    • webpeel by webpeel

      webpeelofficial

      webpeel
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      The web data platform for AI agents. Fetch, search, crawl, extract, monitor, and screenshot any URL. 55+ domain extractors, 65-98% token savings. 7 MCP tools included.
      332 npm
      12
      AGPL 3.0

    • ratatosk

      PabloSergi
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users to build, run, and repair deterministic web scrapers through MCP tools, and to fetch scraped data without needing a model at runtime.
      3 npm
      Apache 2.0

    • TheCrawler

      manchittlab
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Open-source web scraper and extraction MCP server with JavaScript rendering, markdown output, PDF/DOCX parsing, structured errors, and validated extraction contract diagnostics for agents.
      2
      AGPL 3.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The tools mostly have distinct purposes: fetch grabs raw content, extract does structured LLM extraction, recipes are deterministic parsers, health_check verifies things. There's some boundary fuzziness between fetch and extract (both fetch a URL), and between extract and use_recipe (both produce structured data), but descriptions strongly clarify which to use when.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tools use consistent snake_case naming with imperative verbs (fetch, extract, list, use, health_check). 'list_recipes' and 'use_recipe' pair well, and 'health_check' is clear. Minor inconsistency: health_check is a compound noun rather than verb_noun, and 'extract'/'fetch' are bare verbs without object nouns, though still readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is well-scoped for a web-scraping/extraction server. Each tool serves a distinct layer of the pipeline (fetching, LLM extraction, deterministic recipes, recipe invocation, health verification), with no redundant or padding tools.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the full extraction lifecycle: discover recipes (list_recipes), use them (use_recipe), fall back to generic extraction (extract), basic fetching (fetch), and verification (health_check). Minor gap: no listing or discovery of available entities/boards beyond recipes, and no way to retrieve cached/past results, but the core workflow is complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources