Cairo Coder
This server provides AI-powered assistance for Cairo and Starknet development:
Write Cairo code: Generate smart contracts and code from scratch
Refactor code: Improve and optimize existing Cairo code
Implement features: Complete TODOs and add specific functionality
Learn Starknet ecosystem: Get contextual information about Starknet
Best practices: Receive development advice based on documentation
Contextual assistance: Provide code snippets for more accurate responses
API integration: Connect to Cairo Coder API with custom or public endpoints
Provides support for issue tracking and contributions through GitHub repository
Distributes the Cairo Coder API package which can be installed and run via npm or npx
Offers guidance on implementing OpenZeppelin libraries in Cairo smart contracts for Starknet
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@Cairo Coderwrite a Cairo contract for a simple voting system"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
Cairo Coder MCP Server
A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Cairo and Starknet development assistance via the Cairo Coder API.
⚠️ Repository Moved / Deprecated
This project now lives in the Ask Starknet monorepo
The npm package remains published here
This repo will not receive further updates.
Related MCP server: ARBuilder
Quick Start
Install via Claude Code
# Install Cairo Coder MCP
claude mcp add cairo-coder -e CAIRO_CODER_API_KEY=YOUR-API-KEY-HERE -- npx -y @kasarlabs/cairo-coder-mcpNote: Replace YOUR-API-KEY-HERE with your actual API key from cairo-coder.com
Manual Usage
Use this MCP server directly with npx:
npx -y @kasarlabs/cairo-coder-mcpConfiguration
The server supports two modes of operation:
Mode 1: Public Cairo Coder API (Default)
Use the official Cairo Coder API with your API key.
Environment Variables:
CAIRO_CODER_API_KEY: Your Cairo Coder API key (required)
MCP Client Setup:
{
"mcpServers": {
"cairo-coder": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "@kasarlabs/cairo-coder-mcp"],
"env": {
"CAIRO_CODER_API_KEY": "your-api-key-here"
}
}
}
}Mode 2: Local/Custom Endpoint
Use a local or custom Cairo Coder API endpoint (no API key required).
Environment Variables:
CAIRO_CODER_API_ENDPOINT: Your local endpoint URL (e.g., "http://localhost:8000")
MCP Client Setup:
{
"mcpServers": {
"cairo-coder": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "@kasarlabs/cairo-coder-mcp"],
"env": {
"CAIRO_CODER_API_ENDPOINT": "http://localhost:8000"
}
}
}
}Note: When using
CAIRO_CODER_API_ENDPOINT, the server automatically switches to local mode and no API key is required or used.
Available Tools
assist_with_cairo
Get help with Cairo and Starknet development tasks.
Parameters:
query(string, required): Your Cairo/Starknet development questioncontext(string, optional): Additional context or code snippets
Examples:
// Simple request
{
"query": "Write a simple Cairo contract that implements a counter"
}
// With context
{
"query": "How can I optimize this contract?",
"context": "#[starknet::contract]\nmod Counter {\n // existing code here\n}"
}What You Can Do
Write Cairo code: Generate smart contracts and Cairo code
Refactor code: Improve and optimize existing code
Implement features: Complete TODOs and implement specific functionality
Learn Starknet: Get contextual information about the Starknet ecosystem
Best practices: Receive advice based on Cairo/Starknet documentation
Tips for Better Results
Use specific queries (e.g., "Using OpenZeppelin to build an ERC20" instead of just "ERC20")
Include relevant code snippets when working with existing code
Provide necessary context for more accurate responses
Development
Prerequisites
Node.js >= 18
npm or yarn
Local Installation
git clone <repository-url>
cd cairo-coder-mcp
npm installAvailable Scripts
npm run build # Build the project
npm run dev # Start in development mode
npm start # Start in production modeLicense
MIT
Support
For issues and questions:
GitHub Issues: Create an issue
MCP Documentation: Model Context Protocol
Contributing
Contributions are welcome! Please check the contribution guidelines before submitting a PR.
Available Tools
1 toolassist_with_cairoA
Provides assistance with Cairo and Starknet development tasks through AI-powered analysis.
Call this tool when the user's request involves writing, refactoring, implementing from scratch, or completing specific parts (like TODOs) of Cairo code or smart contracts.
The tool analyzes the query and context against Cairo/Starknet best practices and documentation, returning helpful information to generate accurate code or explanations.
This tool should also be called to get a better understanding of Starknet's ecosystem, features, and capacities.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | Yes | The user's question regarding Cairo and Starknet development. Try to be as specific as possible for better results (e.g., 'Using OpenZeppelin to build an ERC20' rather than just 'ERC20'). | |
| codeSnippets | No | Optional: Code snippets for context. This will help the tool understand the user's intent and provide more accurate answers. Provide as much relevant code as possible to fit the user's request. | |
| history | No | Optional: The preceding conversation history. This can help the tool understand the context of the discussion and provide more accurate answers. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It describes the tool's function ('AI-powered analysis') and output ('returning helpful information to generate accurate code or explanations'), which covers basic behavior. However, it lacks details on limitations, error handling, or performance characteristics (e.g., response time, accuracy constraints), which would be valuable for an AI agent to know when invoking this tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is appropriately sized and front-loaded, with the core purpose stated first. Each sentence adds value: the first defines the tool, the second provides usage guidelines, the third explains the analysis process, and the fourth adds an extra use case. While efficient, the final sentence could be integrated more seamlessly, and there's minor repetition (e.g., 'accurate' appears twice), preventing a perfect score.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the complexity of the tool (AI-powered analysis with 3 parameters) and the absence of both annotations and an output schema, the description is moderately complete. It covers purpose and usage well but lacks details on behavioral traits (e.g., how the AI analysis works, potential limitations) and output format. Without an output schema, the description should ideally hint at what the tool returns, but it only vaguely mentions 'helpful information,' leaving gaps for an AI agent to understand the full context.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema description coverage is 100%, meaning all parameters are well-documented in the input schema itself. The description does not add any additional meaning or context about the parameters beyond what the schema provides (e.g., it doesn't explain how 'query' interacts with 'codeSnippets' or 'history' in practice). According to the rules, when schema coverage is high (>80%), the baseline score is 3 even without parameter info in the description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'Provides assistance with Cairo and Starknet development tasks through AI-powered analysis.' It specifies the verb ('assists with') and resource ('Cairo and Starknet development tasks'), making it easy to understand what the tool does. However, since there are no sibling tools mentioned, it cannot differentiate from alternatives, preventing a perfect score of 5.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides explicit guidance on when to use the tool: 'Call this tool when the user's request involves **writing, refactoring, implementing from scratch, or completing specific parts (like TODOs)** of Cairo code or smart contracts.' It also includes additional use cases like understanding Starknet's ecosystem. This comprehensive guidance leaves no ambiguity about appropriate usage scenarios.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
TDQS
With only one tool, there is no ambiguity or overlap between tools. The tool 'assist_with_cairo' has a clear and distinct purpose focused on Cairo and Starknet development assistance.
Since there is only one tool, naming consistency is inherently perfect. The tool name 'assist_with_cairo' follows a clear verb_noun pattern and is descriptive of its function.
A single tool is too few for a server named 'Cairo Coder' that aims to assist with development tasks. This suggests a thin surface that may not adequately cover the domain of Cairo/Starknet development, such as lacking separate tools for code analysis, debugging, or testing.
The tool set is severely incomplete for the apparent domain. While 'assist_with_cairo' covers general assistance, there are obvious gaps in CRUD/lifecycle coverage, such as no tools for compiling, deploying, testing, or managing contracts, which are essential for development workflows.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
The OpenZeppelin Cairo Contracts MCP server generates secure smart contracts in the Cairo language for Starknet environments based on OpenZeppelin templates. It brings OpenZeppelin's proven security and style rules directly into AI-driven development workflows to create safe, production-ready contracts. Key capabilities include providing templates for ERC-20, ERC-721, ERC-1155, Multisig, Governor, and Vesting contracts.
Generate a typed SDK, CLI, and MCP server from any OpenAPI or GraphQL spec, and keep them current.
7 agent tools (prune, convert, estimate, diff, patch, generate, validate). USDC on Base L2.
The OpenZeppelin Solidity Contracts MCP server integrates OpenZeppelin's security and style rules into AI-driven development workflows, enabling AI assistants to generate safe, correct, and production-ready smart contracts. It automatically validates generated code against OpenZeppelin standards (including imports, modifiers, naming conventions, and security checks) and supports various contract types including ERC-20, ERC-721, ERC-1155, Stablecoins, RWA, Governor, and Account contracts through prompt-driven workflows.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceBuild powerful and secure AI agents powered by Starknet.296MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAI-powered code generator for the Arbitrum ecosystem with 19 MCP tools. Generates Stylus smart contracts (Rust/WASM), SDK bridging code, full-stack dApps, and Orbit chain deployments using RAG-based retrieval over Arbitrum documentation.1924MIT

Pentagonalofficial
AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAI-powered smart contract forge with an 8-agent adversarial security audit system. Generate, audit, fix, and compile Solidity and Anchor/Rust contracts across 8 chains.7691MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceGenerates production-ready MCP servers from natural language, OpenAPI specs, database schemas, GraphQL schemas, or ontologies.861MIT
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/KasarLabs/cairo-coder-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server