Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to repograph

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides semantic code intelligence to help users search, navigate, and analyze entire codebases using plain English. It enables Claude to perform architectural overviews, bug detection, and refactor suggestions through local semantic search and keyword indexing.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables Claude Code to query a local, import-aware graph of a repository, so questions like who calls a function, what breaks if it changes, and what imports a file are answered in one lookup instead of a search-and-read loop. It also persists durable session notes and offers full-text search over past session transcripts, all through MCP tools.
      36 PyPI
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to intelligently analyze and query codebases using knowledge graphs, supporting natural language code search, relationship discovery, and incremental updates.
      11
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides Claude Code with local semantic search and indexing of your codebase using AST-aware chunking and hybrid search, enabling deep code understanding without sending data to the cloud.
      61 PyPI
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables semantic code search and AI-powered Q\&A over vectorized repositories directly within Claude. It provides tools to search code chunks, answer questions grounded in source code, and inspect repository snapshot metadata.
      6 npm
      -

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool produces a clearly different artifact: full graph JSON, a rendered HTML visual, or a reverse-dependency blast radius for one file. Descriptions explicitly cross-reference each other ('use X when you need Y'), so misselection is very unlikely.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All three names follow a strict verb_noun snake_case pattern (scan_repository_graph, generate_architecture_html, query_impact_path) with unambiguous verbs.

    Tool Count4/5

    Three tools is on the lean side but each covers a genuinely distinct output mode (data, visualization, targeted analysis) with no filler. The narrow scope is intentional and coherent rather than anemic.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core lifecycle: extract graph, export it, and analyze impact of a change, including error recovery hints for unknown files. Minor gaps exist (e.g. no tool to query a single node's details or filter/cluster views without pulling the whole graph), but the full graph output makes these workable.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues