Skip to main content
Glama
Karopatu

Email Management MCP Server

by Karopatu

Related Servers

Alternatives to Email Management MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to read recent emails and fetch full email content from an IMAP inbox, allowing natural language queries about email summaries.
      3
      -
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to read and interact with a user's email inbox via IMAP, fetching recent emails and reading their full content.
      8
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to read, search, and manage emails via IMAP with secure, read-only access to email accounts.
      6
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to read, search, compose, and send emails by connecting to any IMAP/SMTP provider. It supports comprehensive mailbox management, including draft handling and message deletion, directly through natural language.
      10
      209 npm
      10
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to interact with email accounts via IMAP and SMTP, supporting mailbox listing, email search, retrieval, sending, and management.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to read, send, organize, and search emails across multiple IMAP/SMTP mailboxes.
      1,026 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: fetch-emails retrieves emails from an inbox with filtering options, while send-email sends emails out. There is no overlap in functionality, making it easy for an agent to choose the correct tool for reading versus sending.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow a consistent verb-noun pattern with hyphen separation (fetch-emails, send-email). The naming is predictable and readable, with no deviations in style or convention across the set.

    Tool Count2/5

    With only 2 tools, the server feels thin for an email management domain. Key operations like replying to emails, deleting emails, managing folders, or marking emails as read are missing, which limits the server's utility and scope.

    Completeness2/5

    The toolset is severely incomplete for email management. It covers basic fetch and send but lacks essential CRUD/lifecycle operations such as update (e.g., reply, forward), delete, or organizational functions (e.g., move to folder). This will cause agent failures in common email workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues