Skip to main content
Glama
KanoCifer

DevTask Mcp

by KanoCifer
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to DevTask Mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Weft

      AndreiFinogeev
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to manage a persistent Scrumban board through natural language, including capturing, moving, and completing tasks, with leasing, progress reporting, and human-in-the-loop decision handling.
      4 npm
      MIT

    • Casefile

      azimov777
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Self-hosted task tracker and MCP server for AI coding agents. Append-only case files preserve decisions, failed attempts, questions, and check results across sessions. A live web board lets people track progress and answer agents. Runs locally in Docker and connects to Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and other Streamable HTTP MCP clients. MIT licensed.
      30
      6
      MIT

    • todo-mcp

      Karsten-Larson
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to manage a local-first Kanban board with Azure DevOps-style workflow rules, including task creation, status updates, subtask breakdown, full-text search, daily summaries, and next-task suggestions.
      -
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    All six tools have clearly distinct purposes: create, get by ObjectID, get by slug, get frontier tasks, list with filters, and update. No functional overlap.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (e.g., create_dev_task, get_dev_task_by_slug, list_dev_tasks), making it easy to predict behavior.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools strike a good balance, covering core CRUD plus a specialized frontier query without being too many or too few for a task management MCP server.

    Completeness4/5

    The tools cover creation, reading (multiple variants), listing, and updating. The only notable gap is the absence of a dedicated delete tool, though soft-delete is supported via list filtering.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources