Skip to main content
Glama
KanoCifer

DevTask Mcp

by KanoCifer
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to DevTask Mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Weft

      AndreiFinogeev
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to manage a persistent Scrumban board through natural language, including capturing, moving, and completing tasks, with leasing, progress reporting, and human-in-the-loop decision handling.
      14 npm
      MIT

    • Casefile

      azimov777
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Self-hosted task tracker and MCP server for AI coding agents. Append-only case files preserve decisions, failed attempts, questions, and check results across sessions. A live web board lets people track progress and answer agents. Runs locally in Docker and connects to Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and other Streamable HTTP MCP clients. MIT licensed.
      10
      30
      5
      MIT

    • todo-mcp

      Karsten-Larson
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to manage a local-first Kanban board with Azure DevOps-style workflow rules, including task creation, status updates, subtask breakdown, full-text search, daily summaries, and next-task suggestions.
      -
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    All six tools have clearly distinct purposes: create, get by ObjectID, get by slug, get frontier tasks, list with filters, and update. No functional overlap.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (e.g., create_dev_task, get_dev_task_by_slug, list_dev_tasks), making it easy to predict behavior.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools strike a good balance, covering core CRUD plus a specialized frontier query without being too many or too few for a task management MCP server.

    Completeness4/5

    The tools cover creation, reading (multiple variants), listing, and updating. The only notable gap is the absence of a dedicated delete tool, though soft-delete is supported via list filtering.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources