MCP Server Python
Related Servers
Alternatives to MCP Server Python
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA Python-based MCP server providing essential utility tools: web fetching, current time, and calculator functionality.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for querying case lists from the TJSP court (eproc) via official sources. It provides one read-only tool to consult court cases through natural language in any MCP-compatible client.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA basic educational MCP server that provides simple tools for mathematical calculations, text manipulation, and time retrieval. Designed for learning MCP implementation patterns and development purposes.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA production-ready MCP server providing file, system, math, and text utilities through a simple CLI client.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA minimal MCP server providing basic tools for arithmetic, text echoing, and timezone-aware current time retrieval.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for querying Brazil's CNJ DataJud public API. Enables validating CNJ process numbers, searching lawsuits by number, and listing courts.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 7 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: ping is a health check, soma does arithmetic, agora provides date/time, inverter_lista reverses lists, and the three jurisprudencia tools handle different aspects of legal document search (basic, detail, advanced). No two tools overlap in functionality.
Names are in Portuguese but follow mixed patterns: some are single nouns (ping, soma, agora), some are verb_noun (inverter_lista, buscar_jurisprudencia), and one is noun_noun (detalhe_jurisprudencia). The advanced search includes an adjective suffix. This inconsistency can confuse an agent trying to infer naming conventions.
With 7 tools, the count is moderate. However, the tools cover two unrelated domains (generic utilities and legal research), making the set feel like a collection of random functions rather than a focused server. The number is not extreme but the lack of thematic cohesion reduces appropriateness.
The legal research subset has basic search, detail retrieval, and advanced search, but lacks any write operations (e.g., save, annotate). The generic utilities are a few arbitrary functions (ping, sum, date, reverse list) with no broader context or coverage of a domain. The surface feels incomplete and arbitrary.