Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to @attrkit/mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables managing Meta advertising accounts, campaigns, ad sets, creatives, audiences, reporting, and batch workflows through an authenticated MCP endpoint with per-workspace OAuth connections.
      10 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients such as Claude, Codex, and Cursor to read projects, monitors, captured AI answers, account/plan usage, and AI-referral analytics, and to set up projects, monitors, goals, and analytics properties. It also supports checking tracking-snippet verification, with monitor creation starting metered runs that consume credits.
      20
      43 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables account setup, campaign/ad set/creative/audience management, reporting insights, and batch workflows against the Meta Marketing API, with OAuth-backed multi-tenant workspace authentication.
      10 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables authenticated management of email, drafts, sending, domains, contacts, templates, campaigns, workflows, and webhooks through typed MCP tools backed by a REST API.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 39 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools are clearly separated by resource and action (apps, API keys, integrations, links, spend, events, webhooks), and the descriptions add useful distinguishing detail. A few analytics tools overlap: list_campaigns exposes recommendation/profit fields also surfaced by get_campaign_decision, and list_ads/get_spend both touch performance and spend, so agents may need to read descriptions carefully.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Names are overwhelmingly lowercase snake_case with a verb_noun pattern (list_apps, create_integration, update_link_status), making the set predictable. Exceptions like whoami and minor verb choices such as archive versus delete or get versus lookup are still readable and semantically reasonable.

    Tool Count2/5

    39 tools is well above the 3-15 well-scoped range and makes this a heavy MCP surface. Although the platform is broad, the tool count likely needs splitting or consolidation into more focused servers.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage spans app lifecycle, API keys, integrations, links, campaigns/decisions, spend, events, webhooks, RevenueCat, and usage caps, so core workflows are mostly complete. Minor gaps remain: no app delete (archive only), no link delete, no webhook update, and no single-resource getters for some resources.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues