luogu-mcp-server
Related Servers
Alternatives to luogu-mcp-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceRead-only MCP server for accessing AtCoder problem statements and samples, enabling problem retrieval and search without contest interference.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that provides integration with LeetCode APIs, enabling automated interaction with programming problems, contests, solutions, and user data across both leetcode.com and leetcode.cn platforms.9196 npm151MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceRead-only MCP server for Chaoxing (学习通) that logs into a user's account and exposes their class schedule, enrolled courses, course materials downloads, homework status, exam schedules and scores, chapter task-point progress, notices, and personal cloud drive files. Enables any MCP client to answer natural-language questions about a student's coursework without submitting anything or modifying account data.4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA feature-rich LeetCode MCP server that enables problem search, user data retrieval, code execution, and notes management for both leetcode.com and leetcode.cn.MIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides tools to interact with the LeetCode API, enabling problem fetching, code template generation, and solution execution/submission.71-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceUnofficial MCP server for searching and recommending Baekjoon (BOJ) problems using the solved.ac API.1047 npm3MIT
TDQS
Scored across 11 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes, but luogu_find_related_problems and luogu_recommend_problems overlap in recommending problems, and luogu_fetch_problem vs luogu_resolve_problem serve similar fetching roles with different inputs, which may cause minor confusion.
All tools follow a consistent 'luogu_verb_noun' pattern using snake_case, with clear verb choices that describe the action (fetch, search, find, etc.). No mixing of conventions.
11 tools is within the ideal 3-15 range, covering problem retrieval, search, recommendation, problem sets, user profile, algorithm topics, and capabilities. The scope is well-balanced.
The tool set covers problem discovery, retrieval, and user profiles comprehensively, but lacks tools for submissions, authentication, or contest data. However, given the apparent focus on problem exploration, it is reasonably complete.