Skip to main content
Glama
Kadihx
by Kadihx

Related Servers

Alternatives to jev-super-agent

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides coding agents with structured planning, persistent project memory, automated verification, and safety permission controls through MCP tools, enabling better planning, context retention, self-checking, and guarded execution.
      1 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Autonomous spec-to-product coding-agent CLI. Its MCP server exposes 34 tools over stdio: project state and task-queue ops, memory retrieve/store, code search, quality and verification reports, repo hotspots/co-changes, and structured findings/learnings.
      1,179 npm
      1,068
      Business Source 1.1
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      All-in-one 24-tool MCP runtime and 180-skill library providing protocol-level C4 workflow gates, cognitive reasoning engines, and safe execution for AI coding agents.
      24
      11 npm
      26
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Self-hosted memory and governance layer for AI coding agents. 28 MCP tools with hybrid search, structured knowledge capture, behavioral nudges, and git-native storage. Zero cloud dependencies.
      30
      6
      Business Source 1.1
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to perform file, search, patch, git, process, test, package, network, and system operations through 60 typed MCP tools with structured inputs/outputs, structured errors, and a full event journal, replacing terminal use with a typed machine API.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 24 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target a clearly distinct resource or stage, and the descriptions are detailed enough to separate them. A few pairs (jev_evaluate/jev_decide, jev_research/jev_rerank, jev_plan/jev_redteam) share conceptual machinery, but their intended workflows are still distinguishable.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The common 'jev_' prefix and snake_case style provide a consistent family feel, but the underlying pattern is mixed: some tools are verbs (jev_decide, jev_verify), some verb_noun (jev_label_dataset, jev_distill_recipe), and some nouns or noun phrases (jev_memory, jev_features, jev_preference_pairs). The separate 'hub_' prefix also breaks the single naming scheme.

    Tool Count3/5

    At 24 tools, the set sits squarely in the heavy range and includes several highly specialized or self-diagnostic tools (jev_features, jev_backend_info, hub_stats). It is not egregious because the server appears to be a broad all-in-one agent platform, but the count still feels larger than a tightly scoped MCP server.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers major agent workflows well: research, decision-making, planning, red-teaming, dataset preparation, safety checks, and verification. Minor gaps exist—there is no explicit implementation/execution tool and no training execution step beyond emitting recipes—but these are likely handled outside this server or are intentional boundaries.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues