jev-super-agent
Related Servers
Alternatives to jev-super-agent
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides coding agents with structured planning, persistent project memory, automated verification, and safety permission controls through MCP tools, enabling better planning, context retention, self-checking, and guarded execution.1 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables coding agents to make structured local decisions, choose bounded browser actions with approvals, and run coding workflows such as file relevance, context pruning, diff screening, and completion checks through MCP or CLI.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceExposes local MCP tools for typed, calibrated LLM decisions — gating risky actions, yes/no judging, classification, ordinal rating, and multi-question decisions in one pass. Runs on the model Devin's CLI already provides via ACP (or a fully offline local backend), so agents get calibrated confidence with no extra API key, no Ollama, and no waitlist.7MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables coding agents to make cheap, fast probabilistic decisions on every turn, with tools for coding-loop checks, review, verification, screening untrusted input, and ranking candidates.6447 npm61MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceAutonomous spec-to-product coding-agent CLI. Its MCP server exposes 34 tools over stdio: project state and task-queue ops, memory retrieve/store, code search, quality and verification reports, repo hotspots/co-changes, and structured findings/learnings.13,524 npm1,088Business Source 1.1
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceAll-in-one 24-tool MCP runtime and 180-skill library providing protocol-level C4 workflow gates, cognitive reasoning engines, and safe execution for AI coding agents.2413 npm27Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 24 tools
Most tools target a clearly distinct resource or stage, and the descriptions are detailed enough to separate them. A few pairs (jev_evaluate/jev_decide, jev_research/jev_rerank, jev_plan/jev_redteam) share conceptual machinery, but their intended workflows are still distinguishable.
The common 'jev_' prefix and snake_case style provide a consistent family feel, but the underlying pattern is mixed: some tools are verbs (jev_decide, jev_verify), some verb_noun (jev_label_dataset, jev_distill_recipe), and some nouns or noun phrases (jev_memory, jev_features, jev_preference_pairs). The separate 'hub_' prefix also breaks the single naming scheme.
At 24 tools, the set sits squarely in the heavy range and includes several highly specialized or self-diagnostic tools (jev_features, jev_backend_info, hub_stats). It is not egregious because the server appears to be a broad all-in-one agent platform, but the count still feels larger than a tightly scoped MCP server.
The tool set covers major agent workflows well: research, decision-making, planning, red-teaming, dataset preparation, safety checks, and verification. Minor gaps exist—there is no explicit implementation/execution tool and no training execution step beyond emitting recipes—but these are likely handled outside this server or are intentional boundaries.