VA-MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to VA-MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server for AI-powered API testing that enables automated positive, negative, and security testing directly from AI chat interfaces. It supports multiple AI providers and generates detailed security reports.35 npm-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server for AI security analysis, enabling vulnerability scanning, sensitive information leak detection, and GitHub code leak monitoring via 48 tools.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server for the comprehensive analysis of Swagger 2.0 and OpenAPI 3.x contracts. It allows users to extract detailed information about endpoints, request/response schemas, parameters, and security configurations from API documentation.-
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server designed for testing backend APIs for security vulnerabilities like authentication bypass, injection attacks, and data leakage.1416MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that integrates SAST, DAST, and SCA security tools to enable AI-driven vulnerability scanning and automated security reporting. It allows AI assistants to execute and analyze results from tools like Semgrep, OWASP ZAP, and Trivy within a DevSecOps workflow.6MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that scans Salesforce Agentforce metadata for security vulnerabilities using 61+ SAST rules, integrating into AI coding workflows to guard against OWASP LLM top 10 risks.163 npmCryptographic Autonomy 1.0 (Combined Work Exception)
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have completely distinct purposes: one lists supported checks (a domain-specific operation) and the other checks server status (a general utility). There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.
Both tools follow a consistent snake_case naming pattern with clear verb_noun structure: 'list_supported_checks' and 'ping'. The naming is predictable and readable throughout.
With only two tools, the server feels severely under-scoped for a domain like 'VA-MCP' (which suggests vulnerability assessment or similar). A single domain-specific tool plus a ping utility is too thin for meaningful agent workflows.
The server appears to target vulnerability/security checks, but only lists supported checks without tools to run checks, get results, or manage them. This leaves significant gaps that will hinder agent operations in this domain.