Skip to main content
Glama
KSroido

kagi-session2api-mcp

by KSroido
OverviewSchemaRelated ServersScoreDiscussions
Python
Hybrid

Server Quality Checklist

67%
Profile completionA complete profile improves this server's visibility in search results.

  • Latest release: v0.2.1

  • Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one fetches search results, the other summarizes content from URLs. There is no overlap or ambiguity in their functionality.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with the 'kagi_' prefix ('kagi_search_fetch', 'kagi_summarizer'), making the naming predictable and understandable.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 2 tools, the server feels minimal but still reasonable for its narrow focus on Kagi search and summarizer APIs. The experimental nature of the summarizer tool might warrant additional tools in the future.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the two core operations of the Kagi API: search and summarization. While there are no additional utilities like listing or filtering, the basic workflow is supported without obvious dead ends.

  • Average 3.9/5 across 2 of 2 tools scored.

    See the Tool Scores section below for per-tool breakdowns.

    • 1 of 7 community issues answered or closed in the last 6 months
    • 1 commit in the last 12 weeks
    • Last stable release on
    • No critical vulnerability alerts
    • No high-severity vulnerability alerts
    • No code scanning findings
    • CI status not available

  • This repository is licensed under MIT License.

  • This repository includes a README.md file.

  • No tool usage detected in the last 30 days. Usage tracking helps demonstrate server value.

    Tip: use the "Try in Browser" feature on the server page to seed initial usage.

  • Add a glama.json file to provide metadata about your server.

  • If you are the author, simply .

    If the server belongs to an organization, first add glama.json to the root of your repository:

    {
  "$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/server.json",
  "maintainers": [
    "your-github-username"
  ]
}

    Then . Browse examples.

  • Add related servers to improve discoverability.

How to sync the server with GitHub?

Servers are automatically synced at least once per day, but you can also sync manually at any time to instantly update the server profile.

To manually sync the server, click the "Sync Server" button in the MCP server admin interface.

How is the quality score calculated?

The overall quality score combines two components: Tool Definition Quality (70%) and Server Coherence (30%).

Tool Definition Quality measures how well each tool describes itself to AI agents. Every tool is scored 1–5 across six dimensions: Purpose Clarity (25%), Usage Guidelines (20%), Behavioral Transparency (20%), Parameter Semantics (15%), Conciseness & Structure (10%), and Contextual Completeness (10%). The server-level definition quality score is calculated as 60% mean TDQS + 40% minimum TDQS, so a single poorly described tool pulls the score down.

Server Coherence evaluates how well the tools work together as a set, scoring four dimensions equally: Disambiguation (can agents tell tools apart?), Naming Consistency, Tool Count Appropriateness, and Completeness (are there gaps in the tool surface?).

Tiers are derived from the overall score: A (≥3.5), B (≥3.0), C (≥2.0), D (≥1.0), F (<1.0). B and above is considered passing.

Tool Scores

  • Behavior4/5

    Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

    With no annotations provided, the description carries full responsibility for behavioral disclosure. It clearly states the experimental nature, potential breakage, and support for various content types. It does not detail error handling or rate limits, but the explicit warning about instability adds significant transparency.

    Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

    Conciseness4/5

    Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

    The description is concise and structured: a clear purpose statement, a brief capability note, and a critical caution. Each sentence serves a purpose, though the capability note could be integrated into the first sentence.

    Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

    Completeness3/5

    Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

    Given the tool's 4 parameters and existing output schema (not shown), the description provides enough context to understand the tool's function and risks. However, it lacks guidance on error handling, prerequisites (e.g., need for a valid session token), and typical usage scenarios, which would enhance completeness.

    Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

    Parameters3/5

    Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

    The input schema has 100% description coverage, so the baseline is 3. The description adds limited value, only restating the summary_type and engine options in a mildly explanatory way. It does not introduce new meaning beyond the schema's own descriptions.

    Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

    Purpose4/5

    Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

    The description clearly states the tool summarizes content from a URL using Kagi Summarizer, including support for various document types. It distinguishes from the sibling tool (kagi_search_fetch) by focusing on summarization rather than search, though no explicit comparison is made.

    Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

    Usage Guidelines3/5

    Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

    The description warns that the tool is experimental and may break due to internal API changes, which provides important context. However, it does not specify when to use this tool over alternatives or when not to use it, leaving the agent to infer from the sibling tool's purpose.

    Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

  • Behavior3/5

    Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

    No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It mentions numbering and that results are from all queries, but fails to disclose other behavioral traits such as pagination, caching, or auth requirements.

    Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

    Conciseness5/5

    Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

    The description is concise, with three sentences that are front-loaded with purpose. Every sentence adds value without redundancy.

    Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

    Completeness4/5

    Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

    Given the presence of an output schema, return values need not be explained. The description is adequate for basic usage, though it could mention rate limits or error handling for completeness.

    Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

    Parameters4/5

    Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

    Schema coverage is 100%, and the description adds meaning by specifying that queries should be concise and keyword-focused, with essential context. The limit parameter's default behavior is explained.

    Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

    Purpose5/5

    Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

    The description clearly states it fetches web results using Kagi Search, for general search and when the user explicitly asks to 'fetch'. It distinguishes from the sibling tool kagi_summarizer by focusing on search results rather than summaries.

    Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

    Usage Guidelines4/5

    Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

    The description explains when to use (general search, explicit fetch) and notes that results from all queries are numbered continuously. While it doesn't explicitly state when not to use, the sibling context implies summarization is separate.

    Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

GitHub Badge

Glama performs regular codebase and documentation scans to:

  • Confirm that the MCP server is working as expected.
  • Confirm that there are no obvious security issues.
  • Evaluate tool definition quality.

Our badge communicates server capabilities, safety, and installation instructions.

Card Badge

Kagi-Session2API-MCP MCP server

Copy to your README.md:

Score Badge

Kagi-Session2API-MCP MCP server

Copy to your README.md:

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/KSroido/Kagi-Session2API-MCP'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server